On comparing St Mary’s to Johnny Loulou’s

I rather foolishly took a traipse into town the other day. Even given that the weather was as dreich as it can get in Glasgow in January, it was still a miserable expedition. I had not bargained on seeing as many shops closed on Sauchiehall Street as there were. I’ve been busy over the last few weeks (natch) and simply had not had time to wander the highways and byways and when I did wander I found that they were looking the worse for wear.

Several shops had gone completely. Several looked like they were on their last legs.

Some looked to be doing OK and one in particular seemed to be flourishing.

I noticed when I was reading one of the newspapers this week that indeed the shop that seemed to be flourishing was reporting that it had had an astonishingly good Christmas and that all was booming. It was John Lewis.

It struck me that there are some similarities between John Lewis and the kind of church that I’ve been encouraging the Cathedral to become.

First of all, there’s an ethos. With John Lewis this is a combination of two things – “Never Knowingly Undersold” which is their slogan and also the way that the company is structured which is different to the way in which most companies are structured and which tries to give everyone a stake in the enterprise. There is a potent combination of value, quality and doing right that appears to be paying off. They also, interestingly are doing well both online and in the High Street and are expanding in both. It is clearly a brand that has worked to build up a lot of trust.

St Mary’s has an ethos. It is partly articulated in our slogan – “open, inclusive, welcoming”. (Note that like John Lewis’s slogan it is precisely three words long and easy to remember). St Mary’s is a place where ideas matter and where the ethos has developed over the years into something which is tangible. We too aspire to quality, though it is quality without being stuck up or too formal. We too are doing well both online and in the physical building and I see the online stuff as being just another way of doing what we do. The physical St Mary’s experience is enhanced by the online one and vice versa. Some people tend towards one or the other but some people would find the virtual and the physical representations of St Mary’s seemless. The same ethos pervades both the website and the service sheet. Our online evening prayer feels extraordinarily similar to our physical morning prayer. Lots of people know what we stand for and lots of people like what we do. There’s a feeling of excitement about the place.

There’s branding involved in all of this. Marketing too. Lots of careful thinking about what font expresses our values and what happens next when you walk through the door or click on the home-page. But those are the technical things that just make it easier. What really matters is the raw guts of the place – the reason we do what we do. I don’t know whether I could say what John Lewis is selling in one word. I do know we are peddling joy.

Generally speaking, we are not doing incredibly well at communicating such messages as a corporate Scottish Episcopal Church. I don’t think we know what we are offering or to whom we are offering it. Could we offer a three word explanation of our ethos? I’d be surprised.

Some of the reasons we are struggling with this lie with our Bishops though obviously not all of them. It is hard to see how these ethos issues can be clarified without a high level strategy. These days, I fear that our Bishops think that you can do mission simply by working with church-goers and trying to make them bring more folk in. However hard you try to do that, and however important it is to do it, such an enterprise will always be difficult unless there is some national sense of value and purpose.

Those folk, the ones we might want in, need to be offered something. They need to know what we stand for and what it is we have to share.

I don’t think that many of the large denominations are doing well at this these days. Here at St Mary’s, we are probably big enough in the city to push out a message and establish an ethos. There is a narrative about who we are and we have a penumbra – those who look to us who don’t come every week.

(And if you are a penumbran who is reading this, you are dearer to our hearts than gold. Never forget we are praying for you and never feel shy of asking us questions).

What is really difficult these days is trying to do this from a smaller church base. My fear is that the High Street with its missing, empty shops is likely to have its own ecclesiastical parallel. Without a coherent narrative, we are not all doomed. I fear that unless we aquire one though, some of us are.

Mission Plans

I’ve written (and lots of people have commented) on previous mission and ministry plans, policies and plots – here and here.

We now have a new Provincial Whole Church Mission and Ministry Policy to absorb. It is fourteen pages long and has some good things in it. Like lots of long documents, it also has some things that don’t seem quite so good and some things which are not easy to understand.

I balked at the idea that what we need to do is move further towards emphasizing individual dioceses rather than the whole Scottish Episcopal Church in our mission and ministry planning. It seems to me that although some dioceses do well in that world (Edinburgh is doing conspicuously well at the moment) the news for the whole church is very different. The faster we move resources and decision making away from the Province and towards the dioceses, the faster, it seems to me on reading the annual statistics, the decline progresses.

Quite often our mission plans emphasise the things that we are not particularly good at and aim to improve them. That’s really quite a tall order and the very opposite of what someone in a business would try to do. Lots of our churches are not particularly great at working with children for example, but do much better with different constituencies – thirtysomethings or early-retireds or mobile professionals or whatever. Yet most mission plans make working with children a touchstone of success. Working well with children is something that is of great importance and in places which can do it well, needs to be resourced and supported to the highest degree. However, for other churches in the Scottish Episcopal Church, work with children and young people is a bit of a fetish. Something we think we need at all costs but which simply might not be what God (or the world around us) is calling everyone to excel at.

Here in Glasgow and Galloway, we are supposed to be working on

  • prayer and spirituality
  • learning and discipleship
  • missional leadership
  • numerical growth, welcome and integration
  • children and young people
  • imaginative outreach into local communities

Those are not bad things, indeed they are good things. Are they the things that we can achieve enough change with to start the turn around the statistics though? At that point, I’m not quite so sure.

Someone said to me that if I have other ideas on what might stem the decline from our churches, I ought to be up front and say what they are.

Well, that’s a fair request.

Here goes.

I think that very many of our churches would attract more people if the preaching were just a bit better, the singing were just a bit more fun and the congregational (not, for heaven’s sake the diocesan) website were a bit better too. That’s three things that I would make big priorities which I don’t really see reflected in current diocesan or provincial thinking. They are three things we think about quite a lot here and things that can always be improved. What’s more, they are things that can be improved without spending an enormous amount of money.

So, those would be my priorities over three years:

  • preaching
  • singing
  • websites & social media

That’s for stemming decline. If we want to grow then we need to plant some new congregations and use the resources from closing congregations to do so.

What do you think? Are those things as important as I suspect they are at this stage of our common life?

Seeing and hearing

Its funny the difference that video can make to a conversation. I found myself earlier this week engaged in a meeting via skype. Now, I’ve used skype plenty of times for chatting to friends, but this was the first time I’ve used it for a businessy meeting.

That kind of thing clearly can’t replace all kinds of face to face in the same place meetings but this time it allowed two busy people to have a useful meeting which might not have happened otherwise at all.

I find that there are big differences in skype chatting and phone chatting. If you can see the person, you get that whole extra range of little communications clues. If you are using headphones, you’ve also got your hands free.

I recently heard of someone doing paid counselling work using this technology and am aware of international coaching/mentoring arrangements which go on using it.

The world has changed if such technology can be used for such engagement. Distance is diminished. Geography is so much less of a barrier than it used to be.

This is one of the reasons why I’ve been so opposed to the current mission development plans in this diocese. The old assumptions that we will relate most naturally to those most geographically near us are not merely breaking down, they’ve gone.

We’ve been told for so very long that mission has to be contextual. The presumption of far too many people is that context is set more by geographical locality than by the way people live. Territorial boundaries in church life are under huge threat at the moment because the concept behind them doesn’t make sense. Thus we have extra-provincial interventions of the Anglican Communion, cross border meddling with dioceses and the concept of parish, which, we don’t really believe in here in the Scottish Episcopal Church, now, do we?

I tend to think of St Mary’s as a church whose beacon shines brightly across any false boundaries of geography. Most people pass other churches to come here. Most people pass other Episcopal churches to come here. Our light shines out over and beyond our locality, our city, even the diocese. This week, it shone right round the world.

And it is the world which is our context. Not our Regional Council. And that world has changed significantly since the 1970s. The current proposals for a growth strategy for this diocese seem to be not to recognise this at all.

Christmas 2.0

Forgive me posting a video two days running. (I’m still quite snuffly, though am hoping to be capable of thought soon).

This video is too good not to repost though.

Thinking of a way of conveying the message that is just too good not to pass on. That’s the central challenge of Christian mission, isn’t it?

[Well, I say that as though everyone will agree with it, but that kind of thinking is remarkably absent from a lot of mission thinking in the church actually].

How to do a guided tour of a church

Did I tell you how much fun last Friday evening’s ‘Welcome to St Mary’s” meeting was?

No, I didn’t think I did. Well it was great. We had a guided tour of the building and had a good time together. I did a guided tour that I’ve done once before.

Last year we had an open day for photographers (advertised on the Glasgow flickr group – easy!) and I promised them a guided tour at the beginning to put the building in a bit of context.

My guess is that most of those present that time thought that I’d be talking about when the building was built and who gave what to make it so. Well, there are other people who can do that kind of thing better than I can. (I’ve claimed in the past to believe in neither history nor geography and I’m agnostic as to whether I believe in time). Instead, I improvised a tour based on what the building is for and what its used for. So, I chose the traditional pattern of seven sacraments and did the tour based on them. It goes something a bit like this:

Eucharist – at the altar table at the crossing.
Baptism – at the font
Reconcilliation – St Anne’s Chapel, where I hear confessions
Confirmation – at the Cathedra
Marriage – front of the platform and then up to the High Altar where the documents are signed
Ordination – through into the corridor to talk about the pics of Provosts and Clergy
Unction – the Oratory – built as the resurrection chapel and where the holy oils for healing are stored

Its proved a really good way of doing a tour. You get to talk about why people come to the building and how they use it and what they encounter when they are there.

Its a bit of a dialogue too, as people can ask questions. Questions that have come up at one time or the other have included:

Why seven sacraments are there not only two? To which I reply – our church has never numbered the sacraments – 7 is a traditional number. Then we talk about a sacrament being an outward sign of inward grace.

Do you really have confession? Yes. Its not for everyone but important for some people and important for some at certain times in their lives. All Episcopal clergy have to be willing to hear a confession when asked or otherwise immediately point the person to someone who will hear it.

What if someone confessed they were about to ……., what would you do? The seal of the confessional is regarded as absolute in our church but the option of refusing absolution until the person has, for example, gone with you to the police station/handed themselves in/secured the help they need not to harm others etc is always available. Anyway, this scenario is found more often in films and on the telly than in St Anne’s chapel. Reconcillitation is about putting things right with God, not about creating drama.

What if you give someone the last rights and they get better? Then we rejoice! But the idea of getting better should not rule out the reality of dying.

What is confirmation for? We don’t really all agree on this. Some people use confirmation as a rite to recognise they are Anglicans. It can also be used as a rite recognising renewal and recommissioning to a ministry. It can be a way into taking communion for some people but its not a requirement for taking communion in our church.

By the way, I think I see the seeds of this way of doing a guided tour in a mission festival based on the seven sacraments that I participated in whenI was a TISEC student on placement in Christ Church, Morningside. Does anyone remember that?

This Friday evening, we are not having the tour, but I’ll be talking about the ethos of St Mary’s – Open, Inclusive and Welcoming. Anyone who is new or feels new is welcome to come and there will be plenty of time for questions.

Meanwhile, on Saturday, there’s another event for photographers. “Faith and Photographs” will take place from 10 am until 1.30 pm. A short talk from Akma on looking at the building in a new way followed by time for photographs.

Motion 10 – on adoption of paper on Mission Policy

Carried unanimously

Mission Service

There are some glorious photographs of Bishop Idris which have just come to light in which he is shown teaching the faith in the mission field.

The whole set can be seen on Flickr here. If you want a couple of individual starting points, try here or here or here.

The Mission of the Scottish Episcopal Church

Along with three other people, I’ve been given 3 minutes to speak in a General Synod debate on Friday morning about the mission of the Scottish Episcopal Church in 2009. It is a rather well constructed debate, I think. Three speakers, quick buzz groups, contributions from the floor and responses from some of the conveners of committees.

Anyway, three minutes on the mission of the church. I’m mulling it over today. Father Gadgetvicar has already been thinking about it and Mother Kimberly is trying to tie it in with a talk she is giving on twitter.

The timing is tight and will be well under control as it is being chaired by Fr Gregor.

So, three minutes on the mission of the church.

What would you say?

Diocesan Synod

Last Saturday was the diocesan synod here in Glasgow and Galloway. I came back from it pretty depressed and with powerpoint fatigue.

Why depressed? Well, I’m starting to feel uncomfortable about hearing conversations about mission being held as though it is inevitable that congregations will shrink, clergy will die off and become rarer and there will be no money to pay for anything in the future. I just don’t believe that is the future that God wants for us. Apart from anything else, this diocese is in relatively good financial health, having been wise virgins these last few years. We have also just begun yet another mission programme, which seems to have gone down well with those who were there. [See here and here]. Is all really doom and gloom?

I’m also weary of hearing presentations on stewardship and then being asked to approve falling provincial budgets. It almost feels as though those who prepare those budgets (for whom I have a great deal of admiration for their diligence and skill) don’t believe that any of the efforts of the various stewardship processes are going to make a blind bit of difference. If that is true, we should not be wasting our time setting up stewardship processes and if it isn’t, we should be challenging the budgets.

Or have I got that wrong somehow? I kind of hope that I have.

On visiting Perth

I enjoyed my visit to Perth on Sunday evening. Several things stuck me which are worth comment.

  • People seemed in good heart in the diocese. The mission review that Bishop David has been getting them to do seems to have got people thinking and even got some of them excited. I’ve still not seen it and wonder whether it is at a stage where it could be posted online. Other dioceses might be interested in how it has been done and what has been achieved.
  • The service was that well known rite, Four Installations and an Ordination. (The plan is that eventually, we’ll get it made into a film, with Hugh Grant as the glamorous preacher in the Cope of Glory). It struck me very noticeably that so far as I could tell, there were no ecumenical friends in the clergy procession. At state occasions like this, it has been common in recent years to see C of S and RC friends processing in together. Maybe they were sitting in other places in the church. Striking though.
  • The Cathedral looked great. Denuded of most of its pews and lit with new lighting, it looks so much better than the gloomy dark space of old. I particularly liked the long pews placed in collegial format (ie facing in) in the aisles. It helped create a wonderful sense of the gathered community.
  • The other thing which was very noticeable was the age profile of those who were gathered. There must have been about four hundred folk there, maybe more. With the exception of Tim Haynes, it was difficult to see many younger people. From where I was standing, it looked as though most of the younger people present were members of the clergy and most of them were older than me. I found myself briefly wondering what would bring in the young and eager. One of the clergy at St Ninian’s Cathedral in Perth is known to take to the stage and tap-dance from time to time. My question is, would adding a tap routine to the liturgy bring in the young folk, or would it, as I suspect, just pack the place out with even more happy pensioners?