<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Petition and Parliamentary Update</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thurible.net/20090319/petition-and-parliamentary-update/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thurible.net/20090319/petition-and-parliamentary-update/</link>
	<description>The Blog of the Provost of St Mary&#039;s Cathedral, Glasgow</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 21:21:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kennedy</title>
		<link>http://www.thurible.net/20090319/petition-and-parliamentary-update/#comment-8357</link>
		<dc:creator>Kennedy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 19:01:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thurible.net/?p=6032#comment-8357</guid>
		<description>Came across this on the website which was my main port of call during the US presidential elections:

www.FiveThirtyEight.com

http://tinyurl.com/cn58xy


Will Iowans Uphold Gay Marriage?
by Nate Silver @ 7:18 PM

The Iowa Supreme Court ruled today that same-sex marriage is protected under that state&#039;s constitution.

As in California, there will of course be an effort to amend the state constitution to prohibit gay marriage. In Iowa, however, the hurdle to amending the constitution is fairly high: it will have to be approved by two consecutive sessions of the state legislature and then by a majority of the voters. Most likely, this means that Iowans won&#039;t vote on the issue until 2012.

This is good news for defenders of marriage equity, because while you might know it from Proposition 8&#039;s victory last year, voter initiatives to ban gay marriage are becoming harder and harder to pass every year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Came across this on the website which was my main port of call during the US presidential elections:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.FiveThirtyEight.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.FiveThirtyEight.com</a></p>
<p><a href="http://tinyurl.com/cn58xy" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/cn58xy</a></p>
<p>Will Iowans Uphold Gay Marriage?<br />
by Nate Silver @ 7:18 PM</p>
<p>The Iowa Supreme Court ruled today that same-sex marriage is protected under that state&#8217;s constitution.</p>
<p>As in California, there will of course be an effort to amend the state constitution to prohibit gay marriage. In Iowa, however, the hurdle to amending the constitution is fairly high: it will have to be approved by two consecutive sessions of the state legislature and then by a majority of the voters. Most likely, this means that Iowans won&#8217;t vote on the issue until 2012.</p>
<p>This is good news for defenders of marriage equity, because while you might know it from Proposition 8&#8242;s victory last year, voter initiatives to ban gay marriage are becoming harder and harder to pass every year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

