Comments on: The Embryology debates http://www.thurible.net/20080326/the-embryology-debates/ The Blog of the Provost of St Mary's Cathedral, Glasgow Mon, 06 Feb 2012 21:21:47 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Doug http://www.thurible.net/20080326/the-embryology-debates/#comment-5188 Doug Thu, 27 Mar 2008 16:05:05 +0000 http://www.thurible.net/20080326/the-embryology-debates/#comment-5188 I agree, 1 and 3 should go through. With 2, it's a tough one to call. I think there should be a time limit for developement of the "saviour sibling". I agree, 1 and 3 should go through.

With 2, it’s a tough one to call. I think there should be a time limit for developement of the “saviour sibling”.

]]> By: Kenny http://www.thurible.net/20080326/the-embryology-debates/#comment-5185 Kenny Wed, 26 Mar 2008 18:04:40 +0000 http://www.thurible.net/20080326/the-embryology-debates/#comment-5185 I generally agree with you Kelvin. It's almost like "creating a saviour". What happens if "the saviour" fails to save? How would parents deal with that? Or how would a human being feel knowing that he was born only for this reason, successful or otherwise? I'm an old fashioned guy who feels extremely secure knowing that I was born through the love of two human beings who wanted me for no other reason other than to be a product and sharer in their love for each other. I generally agree with you Kelvin. It’s almost like “creating a saviour”. What happens if “the saviour” fails to save? How would parents deal with that? Or how would a human being feel knowing that he was born only for this reason, successful or otherwise?

I’m an old fashioned guy who feels extremely secure knowing that I was born through the love of two human beings who wanted me for no other reason other than to be a product and sharer in their love for each other.

]]>