Comments on: Attention Scottish Episcopal Bloggers

By: Doug

Doug — Tue, 09 Oct 2007 13:02:19 +0000

I noticed this page only 2 days ago and I thought it had been up for a while, now I see it is actually quite new.

I’m just getting back into the way of blogging. I do have a few posts about the Youth Week at Glenalmond but I think that is the extent so far.

By: Bishop David

Bishop David — Wed, 03 Oct 2007 23:00:11 +0000

Seems fine to me – and the Website Moderator becomes the person whose decision is absolutely final?

By: Kimberly

Kimberly — Sat, 29 Sep 2007 08:30:17 +0000

Good to see you affirming your name so clearly Fr Rabbit. I got very confused the other day when a member of your congregation called you by a misleading pseudonymn.

By: Raspberry Rabbit

Raspberry Rabbit — Sat, 29 Sep 2007 00:03:06 +0000

Attack bully and harrass? Nah – tease, provoke and second guess. More likely. Hurrah for real names

Raspberry P. Rabbit
eldest son of Winifred and Nigel Rabbit
Purveyors of fine Canadian Whiskey

By: Kimberly

Kimberly — Fri, 28 Sep 2007 19:35:03 +0000

I think Kelvin has offered a sensible list of criteria for a blog to be included on the provincial web site. The hardest one to quantify is about whether the blog is frequently about being an Episcopalian in Scotland, but it is worth including something to that effect, lest the Provincial web site be encumbered with Molly-cat’s blog on mousing (as yet, but a glint in her eye).

The criteria each of us use for our blog roll doesn’t much matter. On a private blog, criteria for inclusion can be opaque or even arbitrary. On a Provincial Website, the process needs to be more transparent.

By: chris

chris — Fri, 28 Sep 2007 18:48:00 +0000

Is this heading towards rationalisation or what? What criteria, for example, did you use when creating your blogroll?

Amen to the real names, BTW.