<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: You almost have to smile</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thurible.net/20070926/you-almost-have-to-smile/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thurible.net/20070926/you-almost-have-to-smile/</link>
	<description>The Blog of the Provost of St Mary&#039;s Cathedral, Glasgow</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 21:21:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: kelvin</title>
		<link>http://www.thurible.net/20070926/you-almost-have-to-smile/#comment-4327</link>
		<dc:creator>kelvin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 17:17:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thurible.net/20070926/you-almost-have-to-smile/#comment-4327</guid>
		<description>Steg - you say, &quot;And why is the Scottish Episcopal church letting the US get the blame for liberalism instead of coming out firmly in favour of equality for homosexuals?&quot;

My question is, what is the next thing you would like to happen in Scotland? The Primus is doing his bit this weekend for Inclusive Church. It would seem (!) that same-sex blessings are happening more publicly now than they have been happening before. (I know they have been going on in Scotland for at least 30 years). I&#039;m also not aware of anyone &quot;speaking for the church&quot; who has said anything bad about civil partnerships. I think that most people in church are as unfussed as most people outside the church.

So, I&#039;m genuinely interested. What comes next?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steg &#8211; you say, &#8220;And why is the Scottish Episcopal church letting the US get the blame for liberalism instead of coming out firmly in favour of equality for homosexuals?&#8221;</p>
<p>My question is, what is the next thing you would like to happen in Scotland? The Primus is doing his bit this weekend for Inclusive Church. It would seem (!) that same-sex blessings are happening more publicly now than they have been happening before. (I know they have been going on in Scotland for at least 30 years). I&#8217;m also not aware of anyone &#8220;speaking for the church&#8221; who has said anything bad about civil partnerships. I think that most people in church are as unfussed as most people outside the church.</p>
<p>So, I&#8217;m genuinely interested. What comes next?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steg</title>
		<link>http://www.thurible.net/20070926/you-almost-have-to-smile/#comment-4325</link>
		<dc:creator>steg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 08:48:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thurible.net/20070926/you-almost-have-to-smile/#comment-4325</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s still a bit wimpy of them though isn&#039;t it? And why is the Scottish Episcopal church letting the US get the blame for liberalism instead of coming out firmly in favour of equality for homosexuals? I can see that there are some aspects of non- church life that the church wishes to avoid - binge drinking for instance. But why is the church so far behind on good things that have happened, such as civil partnerships? I live in a relatively conservative Scottish town and when I said I was going to a civil partnership party it raised the odd eyebrow, but by and large people weren&#039;t remotely fussed. Why can&#039;t the church just accept it&#039;s a good thing if their clergy can have stable relationships with partner of choice? Signing off in bemusement...................</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s still a bit wimpy of them though isn&#8217;t it? And why is the Scottish Episcopal church letting the US get the blame for liberalism instead of coming out firmly in favour of equality for homosexuals? I can see that there are some aspects of non- church life that the church wishes to avoid &#8211; binge drinking for instance. But why is the church so far behind on good things that have happened, such as civil partnerships? I live in a relatively conservative Scottish town and when I said I was going to a civil partnership party it raised the odd eyebrow, but by and large people weren&#8217;t remotely fussed. Why can&#8217;t the church just accept it&#8217;s a good thing if their clergy can have stable relationships with partner of choice? Signing off in bemusement&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth</title>
		<link>http://www.thurible.net/20070926/you-almost-have-to-smile/#comment-4324</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 00:19:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thurible.net/20070926/you-almost-have-to-smile/#comment-4324</guid>
		<description>Opps. That &#039;anonymous&#039; is actually me. I never was great at filling in forms.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Opps. That &#8216;anonymous&#8217; is actually me. I never was great at filling in forms.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.thurible.net/20070926/you-almost-have-to-smile/#comment-4323</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 00:19:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thurible.net/20070926/you-almost-have-to-smile/#comment-4323</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m still not quite sure of what to make of the HOB statement except that it more or less reiterated the resolutions of General Convention, which was what I expected. And a timely reminder about the (non)Listening Process.
I&#039;ve seen it said that perhaps the intention was to irk the laity (both conservative and liberal) so that they unite against a common enemy - the HOB. 

I know they can&#039;t say much else without General Convention, but I think they could have said it more clearly. It could have been worse, but I still think it could have been better. But then better would be not having the wretched Gen Con resolution in question anyway, and that won&#039;t have a chance to get undone until 2009.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m still not quite sure of what to make of the HOB statement except that it more or less reiterated the resolutions of General Convention, which was what I expected. And a timely reminder about the (non)Listening Process.<br />
I&#8217;ve seen it said that perhaps the intention was to irk the laity (both conservative and liberal) so that they unite against a common enemy &#8211; the HOB. </p>
<p>I know they can&#8217;t say much else without General Convention, but I think they could have said it more clearly. It could have been worse, but I still think it could have been better. But then better would be not having the wretched Gen Con resolution in question anyway, and that won&#8217;t have a chance to get undone until 2009.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: asphodeline</title>
		<link>http://www.thurible.net/20070926/you-almost-have-to-smile/#comment-4322</link>
		<dc:creator>asphodeline</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 18:50:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thurible.net/20070926/you-almost-have-to-smile/#comment-4322</guid>
		<description>Thank you, I knew I could rely on finding a sensible answer to that report here. 
I woke with a horrible headache and couldn&#039;t work out what the dear BBC reporter was on about!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you, I knew I could rely on finding a sensible answer to that report here.<br />
I woke with a horrible headache and couldn&#8217;t work out what the dear BBC reporter was on about!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas McKenzie</title>
		<link>http://www.thurible.net/20070926/you-almost-have-to-smile/#comment-4321</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas McKenzie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 15:50:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thurible.net/20070926/you-almost-have-to-smile/#comment-4321</guid>
		<description>It is the contemporary way of letting your &quot;yes&quot; be &quot;no&quot; and your &quot;no&quot; be &quot;yes,&quot; or &quot;for now,&quot; or &quot;maybe,&quot; or &quot;perhaps&quot; or . . . .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is the contemporary way of letting your &#8220;yes&#8221; be &#8220;no&#8221; and your &#8220;no&#8221; be &#8220;yes,&#8221; or &#8220;for now,&#8221; or &#8220;maybe,&#8221; or &#8220;perhaps&#8221; or . . . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eamonn</title>
		<link>http://www.thurible.net/20070926/you-almost-have-to-smile/#comment-4319</link>
		<dc:creator>Eamonn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 12:09:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thurible.net/20070926/you-almost-have-to-smile/#comment-4319</guid>
		<description>Maybe this is the contemporary way of being &#039;as innocent as doves and as wise as serpents&#039;!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe this is the contemporary way of being &#8216;as innocent as doves and as wise as serpents&#8217;!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

